Tanner v. Ford Motor Company

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JAMES TANNER, et al., 8 Case No. 5:19-cv-02495-EJD Plaintiffs, 9 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ v. MOTION TO REMAND 10 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 9 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiffs allege various state-law causes of actions against Ford Motor Company and 14 Cypress Coast Ford Lincoln (“Cypress Coast”). Ford Motor Company (“Defendant”) argues that 15 this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1332

and that removal was proper. Plaintiffs 16 argue that removal is improper because Cypress…