Legal Opinion

Villa v. Rios

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 5, 2005No. AC 25351PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The defendant, Daniel Rios, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after the jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Alberto Villa. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) denied his motion for a continuance, (2) denied his motion to preclude evidence from the plaintiffs expert witness, (3) precluded the defendant’s expert witness from testifying regarding the reasonableness of the *341plaintiffs medical treatment, (4) charged the jury on mental suffering and (5) failed to set aside the verdict, which the defendant asserts was excessive.1 We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gaudio v. Griffin Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Murray v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Rubel v. WainwrightConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Friedman v. Meriden Orthopaedic Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wager v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  2. Mention v. Kensington Square ApartmentsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API