Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 25, 1992No. 91-930-CR, 91-931-CR, 91-932-CR CA A72283 (Control), A72284, A72285PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant appeals from the sentences imposed on his convictions for sodomy in the first degree, rape in the first degree, attempted sexual abuse in the first degree, four counts of sexual abuse in the second degree and two counts of attempted sexual abuse in the second degree. ORS 163.405; ORS 163.375; ORS 163.427; ORS 163.425; ORS 161.405.

Because the state did not plead the offense subcategory factors, it concedes that the court erred in placing the rape and sodomy convictions in category 10 on the Crime Seriousness Scale, instead of in category 9. State v. Drake, 113 Or App 16, 829 P2d 726…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. FroemblingOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. State v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. EdsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. PartainOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Brock v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API