Lagrone v. John Robert Powers Schools, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENOCH, Chief Justice.
Appellants John A. and Judy Lagrone .have filed a motion to give priority to their appeal. For the reasons given below, we deny the motion and order the Lagrones to file their brief within twenty days.
The Lagrones were franchisees of appel-lee John Robert Powers Schools, Inc., a franchisor of modeling or “self-improvement” schools. The Lagrones gave notice that they intended to terminate the franchise agreement effective in mid-September, 1992. 1 The franchise agreement contained an anticompetition clause, which provided that the Lagrones would not compete with…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Fort Worth Improvement District No. 1 v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1913
- Henry S. Miller Management Corp. v. Houston State Associates, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
- State v. Cook United, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1971
- Ex Parte Lowery, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Rhodia, Inc. v. Harris CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Feagins v. Tyler Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
- In the Interest of J.S., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
- Metcalfe v. WallingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Perry Feagins v. Tyler Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. D/B/A Jack O'Diamonds, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
- Perry Feagins v. Tyler Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. D/B/A Jack O'Diamonds, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009