Legal Opinion
Border Brokerage Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided April 6, 1967No. C.D. 2947PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Chief Judge:
These two protests have been consolidated for the purpose of trial.
Protest 64/1665 relates to certain “Conveyor Chain Parts,” namely, chain links, more specifically identified at the time of trial as consisting of the items of merchandise identified on the various entries as follows:
Entry 05 3834 H-82 links
05 4531 H-78 link
05 5327 H-78-S links
05 5364 H-82 LP chain links
05 5464 H-104 chain links
Protest 64/1691 is concerned with certain “rivets” designated as “H 78 Rivets” on the invoice accompanying entry 05 7321 and as “C 132S Rivets” on the invoice accompanying entry 05 7944.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Smillie & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- General Chain & Belt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Connor v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Remington Rand, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
3Cited by4 opinions
- Avdel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
- Kelco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Northwest Machinery Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- U.S. Import Equipment Distributors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969