Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Thomas

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1922No. Civ. No. 3897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendants upon an order of court sustaining a general demurrer to the second amended complaint for the specific performance of a contract, without leave to amend.

The ease stated by the complaint, so far as material, is in substance as follows: Hattie Mclntire died in September, 1917, leaving an estate the value of which, as distributed to defendants as the heirs of deceased under an order of court, was $3,469.12. It is alleged that in March, 1903, a contract was entered into between plaintiff and said Hattie Mclntire, “by the terms and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Healey v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  4. Flood v. TempletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Stellmacher v. BruderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Andrews v. AikensIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Aeryon Labs, Inc. v. Datron World Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API