Legal Opinion

Hutchins v. . Taylor-Buick Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1930PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.,

after stating the case: The appeal presents the single question as to whether the facts of the instant case bring it within the principle announced in Beck v. Wilkins, 179 N. C., 231, 102 S. E., 313, or the rule applied in Morgan v. Bank, 190 N. C., 209, 129 S. E., 585. We think the case is controlled by the decisions in Beck v. Wilkins, supra, and Hanes v. Shapiro, 168 N. C., 24, 84 S. E., 33.

The relation of plaintiff and defendant was that of bailor and bailee. Ordinarily the liability of a bailee for the safe return of the thing bailed is made to depend upon the presence or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Hanes v. ShapiroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Beck v. Wilkins-Ricks Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Hanes v. . ShapiroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Jeffrey v. . Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Prettyman v. Hopkins Motor Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Millers Mutual Insurance Ass'n of Illinois v. Atkinson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Olan Mills, Inc. v. Cannon Aircraft Executive Terminal, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Sumsion v. Streator-Smith, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Swain v. Twin City Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API