Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 1956No. 19116PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

This case involves the adequacy of the proofs to support defendant’s contention that a loan of $10,000 made by Charles Price, of Burnt Mills Hills, Maryland, to defendant, on or about September 28, 1949,1 was made in the District of Columbia so that the three-year period of limitations prescribed by the District of Columbia Code2 governs rather than Pennsylvania’s six-year period of limitations.3 The record before the court on this motion of defendant for summary judgment4 consists of affidavits, depositions and the pleadings.

An uncontradicted affidavit of Charles A.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Cope v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. United States v. BufordSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  5. Anderson v. BensonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Small Business Administration v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Richardson Associates v. Lincoln-Devore, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API