Legal Opinion
People v. Beaty
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided July 16, 2004No. 5-04-0022PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kuehn
As a general rule, people are supposed to enjoy total freedom, released from jail and/or conditions of bail, on those occasions where the State launches interlocutory appeals from suppression orders or adverse evidentiary rulings. People v. Wells, 279 Ill. App. 3d 564, 567-68, 664 N.E.2d 660, 663 (1996). Supreme Court Rule 604(a)(3) dictates the following:
“A defendant shall not be held in jail or to bail during the pendency of an appeal by the State, or of a petition or appeal by the State under Rule 315(a), unless there are compelling reasons for his continued detention or being held to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. WoolseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. WellsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. AlbitarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- People v. BaltimoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- People v. King - Supplemental filed 1/7/10Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- People v. KingAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- People v. AlbitarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.