Legal Opinion

People v. Beaty

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 16, 2004No. 5-04-0022PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kuehn

As a general rule, people are supposed to enjoy total freedom, released from jail and/or conditions of bail, on those occasions where the State launches interlocutory appeals from suppression orders or adverse evidentiary rulings. People v. Wells, 279 Ill. App. 3d 564, 567-68, 664 N.E.2d 660, 663 (1996). Supreme Court Rule 604(a)(3) dictates the following:

“A defendant shall not be held in jail or to bail during the pendency of an appeal by the State, or of a petition or appeal by the State under Rule 315(a), unless there are compelling reasons for his continued detention or being held to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. WoolseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. WellsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. AlbitarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. People v. BaltimoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. People v. King - Supplemental filed 1/7/10Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. People v. KingAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. People v. AlbitarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API