Larr v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:
The Supreme Court of Mississippi has courteously responded to the certified questions we earlier posed, see 884 F.2d 892 (5th Cir.1989), by explaining that an insurance provision that terminates the contract when an insured reaches a specified age may be waived by the insurer’s continued acceptance of premium payments. Minnesota Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Larr, 567 So.2d 239 (1990); Boult v. Maryland Cas. Co., 111 F.2d 257 (5th Cir.1940). The state Supreme Court noted, however, that application of the Boult principle to the instant case was beyond the scope of its…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. DayMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
- Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Doleac Elec. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Glantz Contracting Co. v. General Elec. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1980
- Citizens Nat. Bank v. WaltmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
- Boult v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Larr v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991