Legal Opinion

Gates Mills Club Development Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1992No. 91-1257PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The decision of the BTA was neither unreasonable nor unlawful and it is affirmed.

Mayfield claims that the BTA abused its discretion in not waiving the administrative rule permitting voluntary dismissals and that the rule cannot be applied without regard to the underlying circumstances relative to material misrepresentation. Mayfield argues that in these circumstances fundamental fairness requires the BTA to make a de novo valuation of the property. Gates Mills contends that Ohio Adm.Code 5717-1-16 permits a voluntary dismissal and nothing presented by Mayfield prohibits it.

Mayfield could have…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trebmal Construction, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Gates Mills Club Dev. Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API