Legal Opinion · Dissent

Capitol Police Lodge No. 85 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 2010No. 2012 C.D. 2009Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION FILED BY

Senior Judge FRIEDMAN.

I respectfully dissent. The majority holds that Article 44, Section 2 of the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Commonwealth) provided a sound, arguable basis for the Commonwealth to assign the operation of scanning equipment in a Philadelphia state office building to an outside vendor. (Majority op. at 410-11.) I cannot agree.

Article 44, Section 2 of the CBA provides that “any and all new posts or assignments which could be staffed by Capitol Police or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 85Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API