Legal Opinion
Roe v. Cargill, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided April 20, 2004No. 02-6020PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DAWSON, District Judge.
Upon motion of Plaintiffs, we issued an order on December 1, 2003 reopening this case after the resolution of arbitration proceedings. Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of Judgment and Confirmation of Award (Doc. 17) and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs and Interest (Doc. 26.) Defendant has filed an Application and Motion to Vacate the Award (Doc. 18.) For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry and Confirmation (Doc. 17) is GRANTED, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 26) is DENIED,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Major League Baseball Players Assn. v. GarveySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Mark J. Hoffman v. Cargill Incorporated, National Grain and Feed Association, Movant. National Grain and Feed Association, Movant/amicus on Behalf OfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Sperry International Trade, Inc. v. Government of Israel, Sperry International Trade, Inc. v. Government of IsraelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Boise Cascade Corporation v. Paper Allied-Industrial, Chemical and Energy Workers (Pace), Local 7-0159Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Producers Agriculture Insurance Company v. FinnemanDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2024