Texarkana & Ft. Smith Railway Co. v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Little River Circuit Court. Plaintiff was not defendant's passenger, but that of the parties who had chartered the train. 22 U. S. App. 220; S.C. 9 C. C. A. 666; S. C. 61 Fed. 605; 2 C. P. Div. 205; 88 Tenn. 692; S. C. 13 S. W. 691; 76 la. 655; S. C. 13 S. W. 691; 76 la. 655; S. C. 39 N. W. 188; 78 Fed. 610; S. C. 2 Am. Ry. Rep. 669; 78 Fed. 497; S. C. 2 Am. Ry.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Little River Circuit Court. Plaintiff was not defendant's passenger, but that of the parties who had chartered the train. 22 U. S. App. 220; S.C. 9 C. C. A. 666; S. C. 61 Fed. 605; 2 C. P. Div. 205; 88 Tenn. 692; S. C. 13 S. W. 691; 76 la. 655; S. C. 13 S. W. 691; 76 la. 655; S. C. 39 N. W. 188; 78 Fed. 610; S. C. 2 Am. Ry. Rep. 669; 78 Fed. 497; S. C. 2 Am. Ry. Rep. 677. It was lawful for defendant to lease the train. 47 Fed. 15; 51 Fed. 309, 318; Sand. & H. Dig., §§ 6321, 6322; 16 Am. & Eng. R. Cas. 501; S. C. 93 N. Y. 609. Where the statute permits a lease, the lesser is not…
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, C. J.
This is an action for personal damages, laid in the complaint at $2,500, and verdict and judgment for $500, from which the defendant railway company appeals.
Perhaps to state the case in the briefest and most intellible manner is to quote from Ihe allegations in the complaint, and then give the evidence in support of the same:
“The plaintiff, Turie Anderson, states that the defendant, the Texarkana & Ft. Smith Railroad Company, is a corporation, organized under the laws of the state of Arkansas, and operated between Texarkana, Arkansas, and Horatio in said state; that on 25th day of July, 1895,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trigg v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Little Rock & Fort Smith Railway Co. v. BarkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
- Hot Springs Railroad v. DeloneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
3Cited by7 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. FergusonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Beaty v. Buckeye Fabric Finishing Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1959
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CobbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Kirkland v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.