Pollock v. Johnson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, Honorable A. T. dole, Judge. The offer of the respondents to accept $50 in payment for services was an offer for settlement only, was not accepted, and was not admissible in evidence.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, Honorable A. T. dole, Judge. The offer of the respondents to accept $50 in payment for services was an offer for settlement only, was not accepted, and was not admissible in evidence. Graban v. Nürnberg (N. D.) 166 N. W. 510; Busch v. S. D. Central Drug Co. (S. D.) 135 N. W. 757; Reagan v. McKibben (S. D.) 76 N. W. 943, 945; Wigmore, Evi. §§ 1061, 1062; 16 Cye. 946; note in 27 L.R.A. 811, 817, 818; Nauman v. Zoerhlaut, 21 Wis. 466; Stryker v. Cassidy, 76 N. T. 50. This court has repeatedly held that it will not reverse the judgment of the trial…
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The plaintiff brings this action to recover from defendant $94.95, with interest, for professional services as attorneys, rendered for and at the request of the defendant. The appeal is from a judgment on a verdict for $94.95, with interest and costs. The judgment must be affirmed for several reasons:(1) A party desiring to move for a new trial or to appeal from a judgment on a verdict must serve with the notice of motion or notice of appeal a concise statement of the errors of law. In this case the appeal was taken in March, 1918, and the specification of errors was not filed or served until…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Karabensh v. GrantNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- Austad v. DreierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Compson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956