People v. Walker
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
For the past 114 years, Illinois law has protected the constitutional right to a fair and impartial trial in criminal cases by providing for the substitution of a judge who is allegedly prejudiced against a defendant. (See Ill. Rev. Stat. 1874, ch. 146, pars. 18 through 21.) Although the procedure for invoking the protections of the automatic-substitution-of-judge statute has varied over time, the prophylactic purpose of the statute has remained the same: this court has consistently held that the statute vests criminal defendants with the “absolute right” to have an assigned trial judge…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- O'CONNELL v. St. Francis HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- People Ex Rel. Sherman v. CrynsIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Kunkel v. WaltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.