Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ewing v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 26, 2007No. S06A1988Published

1DissentCarley, Justice

The majority unnecessarily reverses the judgment of the trial court based upon a ruling which Appellees did not seek, which the trial court did not make, and of which Appellant has not complained.

The majority correctly recognizes that the complaint sought both mandamus relief and damages. In their answer, Appellees included a motion to dismiss the mandamus claim. OCGA§ 9-11-12 (b) (6). In the *655concluding portion of the answer, Appellees asked the trial court to dismiss that mandamus claim, consistent with the motion, and further to deny Appellant all requested relief. Clearly, therefore,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Felix v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Ladzinske v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  3. Donaldson v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  4. Dunlap v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. Clark v. Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API