Moore v. Rohm & Haas Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal an order of the district court dismissing this case without prejudice on the basis of improper and/or inconvenient venue. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. In doing so, we hold that under both the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”) and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) venue was properly laid in the Northern District of Ohio.
I
Plaintiffs-appellants, thirteen retired employees purporting to be representatives of a potential class, appeal the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of their civil…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Baron T. Youn Kyong Hwan Choi, D/B/A Ckh Sportsworld, Ltd. v. Track, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Carl Thomas Rauch, III v. Day and Night Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Kellogg Company v. Toucan Golf, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Sacklow v. Saks Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Karl Tobien v. Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- McAninch v. WintermuteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Scepter, Inc. v. Nolan Transp. Grp., LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
- B.E. Technology, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2013
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.