Legal Opinion
James v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided April 27, 2001No. 06-00-00031-CRPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice CORNELIUS.
Robert James appeals from his conviction for the offense of aggravated sexual assault. He was convicted by a jury, which assessed punishment at life imprisonment. James contends in two points of error that the court erred by excluding evidence about the alleged victim and by improperly admitting evidence about extraneous offenses at the punishment phase of trial.
James does not attack the sufficiency of evidence, which showed that James engaged in sexual relations with his seven-year-old daughter.
James first argues that the court erred by excluding…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Chimney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
- Nance v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Patton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
3Cited by23 opinions
- Chapman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Wallace v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2004
- Antonio Datwan Scott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2006
- Arturo D. Flores v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
- Carlos Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.