Legal Opinion

BRADLEY v. EASYACC.COM, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 2021No. 2:17-cv-01587Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JULIAN BRADLEY : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 17-1587 : AMAZON.COM, INC et al. : MEMORANDUM OPINION DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE December 1, 2021 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Julian Bradley (“Plaintiff” or “Bradley”) Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 125) and Defendants’ Amazon.com (“Amazon”) and Searay LLC d/b/a “EasyAcc.com” (“EasyAcc”) Responses (Docs. 129, 130). For the reasons set out below, the motion is denied. I. BACKGROUND The procedural history of this case is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Andrx Corporation Andrx Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Opticians Ass'n of America v. Independent Opticians of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. Frank E. Acierno v. New Castle CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Frank's Gmc Truck Center, Inc. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API