Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Mid-American Growers, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 2, 1993No. 88 C 980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge:

Before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment. For reasons that follow, the court denies both motions.

FACTS

This litigation arises from a dispute over overtime wages a class of hourly workers at defendant Mid-American Growers, Inc.’s (“Mid-American”) greenhouse claim they are entitled under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (“FLSA”). Harold Adkins filed the action as a representative suit under § 216(b) of FLSA and, after a number of parties opted in the suit, that is how the ease has proceeded. 1

Mid-American owns and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Biggs v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Adkins v. Mid-American Growers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  5. Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida and Robert LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Upadhyay v. SethiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Adkins v. Mid-American Growers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  3. Alderson v. Ferrellgas, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API