Adkins v. Mid-American Growers, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge:
Before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment. For reasons that follow, the court denies both motions.
FACTS
This litigation arises from a dispute over overtime wages a class of hourly workers at defendant Mid-American Growers, Inc.’s (“Mid-American”) greenhouse claim they are entitled under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (“FLSA”). Harold Adkins filed the action as a representative suit under § 216(b) of FLSA and, after a number of parties opted in the suit, that is how the ease has proceeded. 1
Mid-American owns and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Biggs v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Adkins v. Mid-American Growers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida and Robert LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Upadhyay v. SethiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Adkins v. Mid-American Growers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Alderson v. Ferrellgas, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2015