Legal Opinion

State v. Gunn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 17, 1973No. 73-463-C and 73-464-CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPort, J.

This ease raises the identical question decided this day in State v. Heyer, 16 Or App 22, 517 P2d 314 (1973), Sup Ct review denied (1974). Defendant Gunn was separately indicted on July 20,1973, for two crimes of criminal activity in drugs alleged to have been committed on July 13,1972, and August 17,1972. He moved to dismiss each indictment on the ground of prejudice because of “the unreasonable delay” in commencing prosecution. The trial court, after hearing, allowed the motions. The reasons for the delay were the same as set forth in State v. Heyer, supra, and involved the use of the same…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. State v. SerrellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. WillinghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. State v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. State v. McNealCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API