Legal Opinion

Ole South Bldg. Supply Corp. v. Pilgrim

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 21, 1983No. 81-608PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal presents three issues. Citing Hamon Leasing, Inc.v. Continental Cars, Inc., 358 So.2d 442 (Ala. 1978), Appellants state issue No. 1:

"Did the Trial Court err in denying a motion to strike jury demand, stating the demand was timely made, when the jury demand was made two hundred and eleven (211) days after the original complaint containing an equitable and legal claim which was subsequently amended to include only the legal claim?"

Citing Code 1975, § 12-21-161, Appellants state issue No. 2:

"Did the Trial Court err in allowing an attorney previously employed by the defendants to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hamon Leasing, Inc. v. Continental Cars, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Mobile Light & R. R. v. BurchAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Deutcsh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. Merrell v. Joe Bullard Oldsmobile, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Ex Parte Twintech Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Brackett v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Richards v. Lennox Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API