Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 2008No. 28507Published

1Opinion of the Court

DON E. BURRELL, Judge.

Douglas Armstrong (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 1 motion for post-conviction relief.

Standard of Review

Under Rule 24.035, this Court reviews a motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief to determine whether “the findings and conclusions of the trial court are clearly erroneous.” Rule 24.035(k). The motion court’s findings and conclusions are presumed correct. Smith v. State, 240 S.W.3d 756, 759 (Mo.App. S.D.2007). However, if upon review an appellate court is left with a firm impression that a mistake has been made, then the findings and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  3. State v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  4. State v. LinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API