Legal Opinion

Broderick v. Coppinger

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1932No. Civil No. 3181PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Harry Broderick, guardian ad litem for Irene Broderick, a minor, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against A. H. Coppinger and B. L. Walker, hereinafter called defendants, to recover damages for an alleged injury caused to Irene Broderick through the negligent driving of an automobile by Walker while he was in the employ of Coppinger. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, and, after the usual motion for new trial was overruled, this appeal was taken.

The complaint alleges the negligence to consist of (a) the driving of the automobile in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Huggard v. Glucose Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Odegard v. North Wisconsin Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Owens v. Iowa CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  4. Billmeyer v. Queen Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. State v. HaysSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SchnepfArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Romano v. Ann & Hope Factory Outlet, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  3. Goodman v. CarsonArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. McGuire v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. Goodman v. CarsonArizona Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API