Legal Opinion

Sherrod v. Williams

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 1, 2024No. 3:14-cv-00454Unknown

1Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON TRESSA SHERROD, et a/., Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:14-cv-454 Vv. Judge Walter H. Rice WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al/., : Defendants. ORDER SUSTAINING MOTION /V L/M/INE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT REGARDING WAL-MART’S ALLEGED FAILURE TO SECURE THE PELLET RIFLE OR WARN THAT IT COULD BE CONFUSED FOR A REAL RIFLE OF DEFENDANTS WAL-MART STORES, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., AND WAL-MART STORE #2124 (DOC. #389) Before the Court is the Motion jn Limine to Exclude Evidence and Argument Regarding…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simmons v. American Pacific Enterprises, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Mizenis v. Sands Motel, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. McLaughlin v. Andy's Coin Laundries, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Goodman v. Orlando Baking Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API