Legal Opinion

Miller v. Rosenthal

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 27, 1927PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries resulting from slipping upon ice negligently accumulated on a sidewalk by the defendant. The injury was sustained on March 6, 1923. The writ was dated on March 7, 1923. A notice was alleged to have been given pursuant to G. L. c. 84, § 21, as amended by St. 1922, c. 241, on March 8, 1923. The giving of the notice in a case like the present is a condition precedent to the existence of the cause of action. Injury alone cannot have life as a cause of action until after compliance with that condition. Baird v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity v. PufferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Brooks v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Veginan v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. Baird v. Baptist SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Friedenwald Co. v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Paddock v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. Regan v. Atlantic Refining Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Central National Bank v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  4. Martinelli v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Howe v. National Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API