Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Melissa Nelson v. James H. Knight DDS, P.C. and James Knight

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 12, 2013No. 11–1857Published

1ConcurrenceCady, Chief Justice

I concur in the majority opinion, but write separately to further explain the basis and rationale for the decision. Melissa Nelson set forth a claim for sex discrimination recognized by law, but the facts of the case did not establish the claim.

Our state and federal civil rights laws were enacted to eradicate various forms of discrimination from society. These laws prohibit employment discrimination based on numerous grounds, including discrimination “because of ... sex.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(l) (2006); Iowa Code § 216.6(l)(a) (2009). The primary purpose of this law has been to ensure that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API