Bice v. Micon Products International, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
NABERS, Chief Justice.
For the second time, this Court is asked to consider whether Daniel R. Boyd, Debra C. Butler, and Bryan M. Kelley, coal miners who claim they were injured by exposure to a certain chemical while employed as coal miners and whose claims arose in Tuscaloosa County (“the Tuscaloosa plaintiffs”), may pursue their claims against 11 defendants, including Flexible Products Company and Micon Products International, Inc., involved in the manufacture, use, and distribution of the chemical in the Bessemer Division of the Jeffer*113son Circuit Court. The defendants have petitioned for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Sanders v. Empire Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Fitzgerald v. Racing Assn. of Central IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ex Parte Flexible Products Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Ex Parte Children's Hospital of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Maddox v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- Ex parte Gentile Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
- Maddox v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- State of Alabama v. Jay's Charity Bingo Alabama STEM Education, Inc. Abdulahe Jamal and City of Brighton (Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court, Bessemer Division: CV-23-31).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2024
- State of Alabama v. Jay's Charity Bingo Alabama STEM Education, Inc. and Bobby R. St. John (Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court, Bessemer Division: CV-23-28).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.