Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Hammar Bros. White Lead Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 26, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Edwards

delivered the opinion of the court.

Joe Ingrain, appellee, in his suit against Hammar Brothers White Lead Company, a corporation, appellant, alleged in his declaration that he had, prior to June 1,1925, been in the employ of appellant, and that while so engaged he became afflicted with lead poisoning, which malady arose out of and in the course of such employment; in consequence of which he was entitled to seek remuneration under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Cahill’s St. ch. 48, ¶ 201 et seq.; that he entered into an agreement with appellant, whereby the latter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co. v. KendallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  2. Ascher Bros. Amusement Enterprises v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bartlow v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Andrews v. Western Asphalt Paving Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. Thayer v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marth v. Illinois Weather-Seal, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. Graham v. DressenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  3. Franklin v. RandolphAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  4. Spiller v. RivaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API