Bachorik v. Allied Control Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel M. Gold, J.
Motion by defendants Putnam Trust Company of Greenwich and Charles W. Pettengill, coexecutors under the will of Clarence L. Yon Egloffstein, deceased, for an order to dismiss the complaint as against them, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], pars. 1 and 5), is granted.
Initially, upon the decedent’s death, his will was duly admitted to probate by the Probate Judge of District of Greenwich, State of Connecticut. The moving defendants were duly qualified as coexecutors to said will and continue to act as such. Further, from the papers presently before the court, it is apparent that at all relevant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Riley v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Tilt v. KelseySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. United Missouri BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Boone Associates, L.P. v. OasterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Boone Associates, L.P. v. OasterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Morrison Cohen LLP v. SchlassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007