Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided December 12, 2016No. F071654PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDetjen, J.

*670INTRODUCTION

Brandon Lamar Martin (defendant) appeals from the denial of his petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1170.18,1 a statute added by Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act. Defendant asserts his burglary convictions are eligible for resentencing because they would have been convictions for shoplifting, punishable as misdemeanors under section 459.5, another statute added by Proposition 47. We disagree and *671affirm the judgment of the trial court. Section 459.5's use of the term "larceny" does not include all forms of theft. Defendant's felony conviction…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ewing v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. People v. BunyardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API