Meyer v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtBobinson, J.
The appellants were charged in seven separate informations with the violation of § 82-902, Ark. Stats. The cases were consolidated and tried together. Specifically, the defendants were charged with: first, possessing for the purpose of sale adulterated bologna; second, manufacturing adulterated bologna; third, possessing for the purpose of sale adulterated hamburger; fourth, manufacturing adulterated hamburger ; fifth, possessing for the purpose of sale adulterated wieners; sixth, manufacturing adulterated wieners; seventh, possessing for the purpose of sale adulterated liorsemeat. They were…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Fox v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Maxwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. DuffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Gamble v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.