Legal Opinion

Meyer v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 26, 1951No. 4648PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobinson, J.

The appellants were charged in seven separate informations with the violation of § 82-902, Ark. Stats. The cases were consolidated and tried together. Specifically, the defendants were charged with: first, possessing for the purpose of sale adulterated bologna; second, manufacturing adulterated bologna; third, possessing for the purpose of sale adulterated hamburger; fourth, manufacturing adulterated hamburger ; fifth, possessing for the purpose of sale adulterated wieners; sixth, manufacturing adulterated wieners; seventh, possessing for the purpose of sale adulterated liorsemeat. They were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  2. Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  5. Fox v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Maxwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. DuffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  5. Gamble v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API