Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank v. Brooks

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1940No. 7535PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Hickman

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

*372This is an action in trespass to try title instituted by plaintiff in error, The Federal Land Bank of Houston, against a number of defendants, their names being set out in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. 124 S. W. (2d) 161. As we view the record, the question for decision is not at all involved or difficult and it is thought that a condensed statement will be sufficient to disclose the basis of our holding.

Robert Hairston and wife, Ida Hairston, executed to plaintiff in error their promissory note and, as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Howard v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Simmons Hardware Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Word v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Federal Land Bank of Houston v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Masterson v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  2. Bernard River Land Development Co. v. SweenyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API