Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Perkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 10, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 27, 1998, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits. “Determination of whether *801a claimant left his or her employment for good cause raises a factual issue to be determined by the Board and such determination will not be disturbed so long as it is based upon substantial evidence” (Matter of Schwab [Marie—Sweeney], 233 AD2d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FriedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. In re the Claim of HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re the Claim of SchwabAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. In re the Claim of BaxterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. In re the Claim of LymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API