Legal Opinion

Pena v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered on or about January 25, 1996, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly granted because defendant had no duty to maintain the premises where the accident occurred. There is no merit to plaintiffs’ contention that the subject stairway’s sole function was to provide access to defendant’s subway station. The record establishes that the stairway was used in common by the stores in the passageway (compare, Garcia v Arbern…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haberlin v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Garcia v. Arbern Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bingham v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. O'Hara v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Raffile v. Tower Air, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Ceron v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Bingham v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API