Historic Wolf Creek Boatworks v. United States of America
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion
WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA SAM ROMEY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., ) ) No. 5:20-cv-0014-HRH Defendants. ) _______________________________________) O R D E R Federal Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss The Federal defendants (the United States, the Secretary of Agriculture, and five Forest Service employees) move to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint.1 This motion is opposed by plaintiffs Sam Romey, Historic Wolf Creek Boatworks, and Wolf Creek Boatworks.2 Oral argument was not requested and is not deemed necessary.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.