Legal Opinion
Dickerson v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 17, 1982No. A016338PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIAN, J.
David D. Dickerson and Karl D. Chandler seek a writ directing respondent superior court to set aside an order compelling them to answer questions propounded at a deposition. Dickerson is a defendant in an action now pending in respondent court brought by real parties Thomas J. Perrito and others. Real parties moved for an order compelling Chandler, an attorney who had advised Dickerson in matters which are connected with the litigation, to answer questions at a deposition. Respondent court ordered Chandler to answer the questions objected to. Petitioners sought a writ to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Garner v. WolfinbargerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Valley Bank of Nevada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- D. I. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- BP Alaska Exploration, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Oxy Resources California LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Favila v. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.