Legal Opinion

State v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 10, 1984No. C82-11-38132; CA A27882PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*335NEWMAN, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment that found him “not responsible due to mental disease or defect” of burglary in the first degree. The judgment committed him to the jurisdiction of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) for a period of 20 years, a period that corresponds to the maximum term for Burglary I. ORS 161.327(1); 164.225(2). We reverse.

The indictment charged that defendant “unlawfully and knowingly” entered and remained in a dwelling “with intent to commit the crime of theft therein.” ORS 164.225. Defendant notified the state that he would rely at trial on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frendak v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Gilbert F. Sieling, Sr. v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Carrie Jean Heral v. Gayle FranzenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  5. State v. BoothOregon Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Treece v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. State v. HahnWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. United States v. Jonathan ReadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  5. Pratt v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API