Legal Opinion

Walters v. Graham

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 21, 1920PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Taylor District Court. — H. K. Evans, Judge. Foreclosure proceedings. No defense was interposed to the foreclosure proceeding proper. A receiver was appointed to take charge of the premises during the year of redemption and collect the rental of the premises; and from the order appointing a receiver, this appeal is taken. —

1Opinion of the CourtArthur, J.

— This is an action in equity, commenced in December, 1919, to foreclose a mortgage given to secure two notes, dated September 12, 1898, for $9,000. Interest was paid for one year, and, on August 14, 1919, $280 was paid on the principal. The appointment of a receiver to take possession of the mortgaged property and to collect the rents during the year of redemption was prayed for on three grounds:(1) On the provisions of the mortgage.(2) On the insolvency of the mortgagor.(3) That the mortgaged property was inadequate to satisfy the debt, and that the rents were in danger of being lost to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Freedman's Saving & Trust Co. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Kountze v. Omaha Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Bagley v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Des Moines Gas Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. Felino v. K. S. Newcomb Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sheakley v. MechlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  2. King v. GoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Keokuk Trust Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Des Moines Joint Stock Land Bank v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  5. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. PuckettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API