Legal Opinion

Krulder v. Hillman

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action to compel the mortgagee to deliver a bond and mortgage which has been paid and to compel the execution of a satisfaction piece presented by the mortgagor.

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

The plaintiff is the owner of certain real property in Brooklyn on which the defendant held a mortgage of $260, which was duly recorded in the Kings county register’s •office. Prior to the commencement of this action the full amount due upon the mortgage was paid, but the defendant failed and refused to deliver up the bond and mortgage, *210unless the plaintiff would receive a satisfaction piece thereof prepared by her and pay therefor two dollars and fifty cents. This the plaintiff refused to.do, and has brought this action to compel the mortgagee to deliver up the original securities and also…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Halpin v. . Phenix Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Pettengill v. MatherNew York Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barquin v. Hall Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Block v. TickerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. Hasquet v. Big West Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  4. Danches v. PariserAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914
  5. Wellbrock v. HaasAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API