Legal Opinion

Tebo v. Havlik

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 10, 1981No. Docket 52297PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, C.J.

Plaintiffs appeal by leave granted from a trial court order excluding evidence of medical expenses and economic losses in a dram-shop action.

Plaintiff Dorothy E. Tebo was injured when the car she was driving was struck by another automobile driven by defendant Edward Joseph Havlik. Both of these individuals had no-fault insurance coverage and Dorothy Tebo was reimbursed for her medical expenses and economic losses under the personal protection insurance coverage of her policy. Plaintiffs asserted a claim under the Michigan dramshop act, MCL 436.22; MSA 18.993 against defendants Steven Brimmer…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. TuttleMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Perrott v. ShearerMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Motts v. Michigan Cab Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Podbielski v. Argyle Bowl, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Beaird v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Gorelick v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Muranyi v. Turn Verein Frisch-AufAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Newmaster v. MahmoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Erickson v. Hinckley Municipal Liquor StoreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API