Legal Opinion

Streidl v. Community General Hospital

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 21, 1992No. 77 E.D. Appeal Docket 1989PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE

FLAHERTY, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether Superior Court erred in affirming the trial court’s dismissal of a medical malpractice suit against a hospital where the trial court, pursuant to local rule, dismissed the suit because there had been no action on the docket for more than two years. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

On February 4, 1983 Harold and Marion Streidl brought an action against Community General Hospital claiming that the hospital negligently exposed Mr. Streidl to a highly contagious disease. No action appeared on the docket…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Penn Piping, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. James Bros. Co. v. Union B. & T. Co. of DuBoisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Buxbaum v. PegueroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Faulks v. Papo Bar, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Chaplynsky v. Broad Street HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Marino v. HackmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Shope v. EagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Pennridge Electric, Inc. v. Souderton Area Joint School AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Pine Township Water Co. v. Felmont Oil Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Gates v. Servicemaster Commercial ServiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API