Legal Opinion

Hammersmith, Inc. v. Zanfardino

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 16, 1982No. AL-401PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, Judge.

The deceased claimant, a shipping clerk at employer’s wholesale grocery warehouse, was required as a condition of employment to take a polygraph (lie detector) examination. During an investigation of pilferage, he took and failed two such tests. A few minutes after taking a third test, he complained of numbness in his leg. He was ministered to by a rescue squad, but developed respiratory problems and was transported to a hospital where he was pronounced dead on arrival. The cause of death. was a dissecting aneurysm of the aorta (ruptured aorta). The deputy found that being wired…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Victor Wine & Liquor, Inc. v. BeasleySupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  2. Richard E. Mosca & Co., Inc. v. MoscaSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. Silvera v. Miami Wholesale Grocery, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Dukes v. DukesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Kelly v. Florida Atlantic UniversityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. University of Florida v. MassieSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. McGuireDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. City of Opa Locka v. QuinlanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. State, Division of Hotels/restaurants v. ColeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API