Legal Opinion

Bey v. Troutman & Sanders, LLP

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 8, 2019No. 1:19-cv-05013Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GENESIS BEY, Plaintiff, 19-CV-5013 (CM) -against- TROUTMAN & SANDERS, LLP; and HOBBS ORDER OF DISMISSAL INCORPORATED, Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff, appearing pro se, brings this civil action under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(b)(2), a criminal statute. He alleges that Defendants prevented him from engaging in interstate commerce. By order dated June 11, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is, in forma pauperis. For the following…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  4. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hill v. CurcioneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API