Harlan-Wallins Coal Corporation v. Stewart
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Dissent
.MILLIKEN, Justice
(dissenting).
The view of the majority of the court is contrary to the weight of authority and to the modern trend in Workmen’s Compensation law, and is apparently based on the doctrine of stare decisis as applied to Kentucky cases in this field. Whether stare decisis should apply in this field of the law is one question, but whether this court has a sound basis for its application is quite another. This dissent, is addressed to the latter question, and, I believe, throws into high doubt whether Kentucky law is as well settled in this field as the majority opinion assumes…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Phil Hollenbach Co. v. HollenbachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- January-Wood Company v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- A. C. Lawrence Leather Co. v. BarnhillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Big Elkhorn Coal Co. v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Harlan Collieries Co. v. ShellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.