Legal Opinion
Marcell v. Engebretson
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 22, 1934No. 9976, 10030PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The facts out of which this controversy arises are, in substance, as follows:
In’ 1921 the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska appointed a receiver for the Brictson Manufacturing Company, a South Dakota corporation doing business' in Nebraska. Upon appeal, this court determined that there was no basis for the appointment, and required the lower court to turn back the property taken over by its receiver to the corporation. Brictson Mfg. Co. v. Close et al., 280 F. 297. There were delays in carrying out the mandate (Brictson Mfg. Co. v. Woodrough (C.…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cramer v. Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Warder v. BradyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- First Trust & Savings Bank v. Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Doyne v. SaetteleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Grand Boulevard Inv. Co. v. StraussCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.