Legal Opinion

Rosanna Knitted Sportswear, Inc. v. O'Scotland

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 18, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGOHEY, District Judge.

The plaintiff moves (1) to strike the defendants’ demand for a jury trial, (2) to modify a notice to take depositions, and (3) to quash a subpoena duces tecum.

The action is for a declaratory judgment of invalidity and non-infringement of defendants’ patent and for an injunction. The defendants in a counterclaim allege infringement of their patent by the plaintiff and seek damages totaling $1,200,000.

It seems clear from the decisions in this Circuit, that on a motion to strike a jury demand the test is whether the basic nature of the complaint is legal or equitable. If…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ring v. SpinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. Beaunit Mills, Inc. v. Eday Fabric Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Ryan Distributing Corporation v. CaleyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. General Motors Corp. v. California Research Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
  5. Lisle Mills, Inc. v. Arkay Infants Wear, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thermo-Stitch, Inc. v. Chemi-Cord Processing Corp. And Standwear Pleating Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  2. UAI Technology, Inc. v. Valutech, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
  3. Balistrieri v. HoltzmanDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971
  4. Concurrent Ventures, LLC, et al. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API