Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shepard v. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 16, 2005No. COA04-1634Published

1DissentBryant, Judge

The majority holds the statute of limitations for plaintiffs’ claims under Chapter 24 (N.C. Gen. Stat. § 24-1 et seq.) had expired and therefore plaintiffs’ complaint was properly dismissed. For the reasons which follow, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion.

Plaintiffs brought their action alleging the loan origination fee, charged by defendant and rolled back into plaintiff’s high-end second mortgage loan was usurious and illegal under Chapter 24. There are two statutory penalties for usury in N.C.G.S. § 24-2 and each penalty *483has a two-year statute of limitations. See N.C. Gen.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harter v. VernonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  2. State v. GuiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Swindell v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Faircloth v. Financial Asset Securities Corp. Mego Mortgage Homeowner Loan TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  5. Hollowell v. Southern Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API