Shepard v. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1DissentBryant, Judge
The majority holds the statute of limitations for plaintiffs’ claims under Chapter 24 (N.C. Gen. Stat. § 24-1 et seq.) had expired and therefore plaintiffs’ complaint was properly dismissed. For the reasons which follow, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion.
Plaintiffs brought their action alleging the loan origination fee, charged by defendant and rolled back into plaintiff’s high-end second mortgage loan was usurious and illegal under Chapter 24. There are two statutory penalties for usury in N.C.G.S. § 24-2 and each penalty *483has a two-year statute of limitations. See N.C. Gen.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harter v. VernonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- State v. GuiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Swindell v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Faircloth v. Financial Asset Securities Corp. Mego Mortgage Homeowner Loan TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Hollowell v. Southern Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.