Brought v. Howard
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This is an equitable action to compel the specific performance of an alleged agreement between plaintiff and Jonathan R. Brought, now deceased, whereby it is claimed they agreed to marry and make their wills so that the one first to die should leave all of his or her property to the other.
It is claimed deceased violated his agreement by subsequently devising one piece of his property, to wit, lot 3 of block 15 of the city of Phoenix, to Ella M. Howard, and she is made a defendant for the purpose of impressing on her title a trust in favor of plaintiff.
The facts are that plaintiff and deceased…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- McCabe v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- London v. G. L. Anderson Brass WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Upson v. FitzgeraldTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Gonzalez v. SatrusteguiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Kirk v. BeardTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re Balke's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Evans v. MasonArizona Supreme Court · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.